Re: [CR]The solution for higher bars...

(Example: Framebuilders:Jack Taylor)

From: "Rick Chasteen" <rchasteen@kc.rr.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <8a.711bfba.283e8f22@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]The solution for higher bars...
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:49:06 -0500


Fellow Tribemembers:

It is my opinion that elevating the handlebars is the raison d'etre of Moustache bars. These have a much shallower drop than a traditional road bar and will enable the cyclist to comfortably ride a frame smaller than the ideal. The disadvantage of Moustache bars is, in my opinion (no matter what the good folks at Rivendell opine), there are only 2 hand positions for these curiosities: on the hooks or on the outer, straight sections. While I find climbing or sprinting out of the saddle with Moustache bars tiresome and unrewarding, I confess to possessing 3 sets, one of which is employed on my fixed gear.

Perhaps a better remedy for Low Handlebar Height would be the substitution of Nitto Dirt Drops or WTB drop bars. These have much less drop with the additional advantage of greater width.

I realize that the more radical Classicists become apoplectic or swoon at the idea of such substitutions but these are often alternatives to the heartbreak of extended headtubes.

One final thought. Power on the bicycle comes from the lower back and abdomen and in order to tap this resource, one must bend low over the handlebars. This is, of course, recognized in the adage, "If you want to go faster, bend your elbows".

Rick Chasteen, Kansas City


----- Original Message -----
From: TW406@aol.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: [CR]The solution for higher bars...



> Is to ride on the tops and levers, not the drops. Been doing it for 30
> years....dah
>
> Ted
> This side of nowhere