Re: [CR] Re: Here we go again, modern classics, blah, blah, blah....

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Columbus:SLX)

From: <GPVB1@cs.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:28:00 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR] Re: Here we go again, modern classics, blah, blah, blah....
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


Guys:

It's Graftek. Not Graftec, not Graftex. GRAFTEK.

Let's get it right. Good thing there's not a Mr. Graftek around....!

Thank you very much. I feel better now.

Greg Parker A2 MI USA

In a message dated 6/24/02 12:43:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time, classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org writes:


> Message: 14
> From: DAVIDTESCH@aol.com
> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:49:17 EDT
> Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Here we go again, modern classics, blah, blah,
> blah.....
> To: GPVB1@cs.com, rmrose@toast.net
> Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>
> In a message dated 6/23/02 7:33:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, GPVB1@cs.com
> writes:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Additionally, I don't recall that many Grafteks breaking, at least not
> > anywhere near the rate of Titan fork breakage. Remember also that the
> > Grafteks were raced with some success (by the Stetina brothers, for
> > example).
> > They had a much better "feel" than the Titans in many people's opinion.
> >
> >
>
> Remember old does not mean classic, and classic doesn't have to be old.
> Speedwell, Graftec, titan, are indeed classic, if not for any other reason
> their historical significance, their bold move forward. I have a Facet
> Biocam
> frame, Anybody got parts?
> Dave Tesch
> Milwaukee,
> Wisconsin.
> USA,
> Earth