Re: [CR]hetchins/mark joynt/david miller

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

To: tech@worrall.co.nz
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]hetchins/mark joynt/david miller
From: "Richard M Sachs" <richardsachs@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:49:47 -0500

"Do you have richardsachs.net and richardsachs.org registered?"

no, i don't. i don't buy the 'website domain ownership' part of this story legitimizes anything, legal or ethical. e-RICHIE chester, ct

On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:10:39 +1300 David Benson <tech@worrall.co.nz> writes:
> One of the more interesting quotes from Mark Reilly (or is he Mark
> Joynt) yesterday:
>
> "Well it all started a couple of years ago when me and my business
> partner
> were registering domains names, we tried hetchins.com and were
> astonished to
> find it wasn't registered, we did so immediately."
>
> Do you have richardsachs.net and richardsachs.org registered?
> DB
> Ak, NZ
>
>
>
> Richard M Sachs wrote:
>
> >these guys both offer a frame with the same brand name.
> >aren't choices better? either way, it's been 30 plus years
> >since the seven sisters road shop was in its heydey. any way
> >you cut it, they're co-opting the name and keeping it alive
> >for those who didn't live through it. hetchinspete himself
> >admits only jones-ing for the brand for three years.
> >the amount of 'in the image of' hetchins frames offered
> >by both of these guys will be small. they'll make them.
> >people will buy them. i don't see any losers in this issue.
> >
> >both wenger and victorinox each lay claim to the 'swiss
> >army' brand knifes/watches/etcetera. legal and moral issues
> >aside, the buyers always think they're getting the 'real' one.
> >
> >e-RICHIE
> >Richard Sachs Cycles
> >No.9, North Main Street
> >Chester, CT 06412 USA
> >www.richardsachs.com
> >Tel. 860.526.2059