Depends. Does the 16 pound bike have nice head lugs to look at and a pleasant ride? If I've got my head down for 150 km, I'd rather be looking at something besides toothpaste / stack 'o dime welds and not get beaten up by a frame with harsh ride characteristics.
It is all rather hypothetical in my case, so I can be an aesthete rather than an athlete.
While a black and tan sounds good, the single malt cupboard is a closer. It may go better with canard anyway.
Charlie
Charles T. Young
Honeybrook. PA
From: "ken denny" <kendenny66@yahoo.com> To: "wayofftheback" <wayofftheback@yahoo.com>; <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [CR]The canard of lightweight - Simplification
>
> Sure I can. In fact, I'll simplify even further. if yyou were doing a
150km flat time trial would you choose to do it with a 15 pound bike or a 16
pound bike, if both bikes offered the same levels of performance and there
was zero risk in choosing the bike that weighed less?
> Besides, it's fun!! (get it???).
> You are beating a dead horse.
> Ken (the only hub in this universe is the bulge around my mid-winter
waist - damn them Black 'n Tan's are good!) Denny
> Boston