Re: [CR]anodizing and tradition

(Example: Racing:Beryl Burton)

Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:57:09 -0700
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: "Classic Rendezvous Mail List (E-mail)" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]anodizing and tradition
References: <A5E72E8AE73AD311954A009027887CFFCC50A5@SLSERVER>


Grant McLean wrote:
>
> Chuck, Aldo, others (if still following this thread) (cut)
>
> Basically, what i'm guessing is that there was no "master plan" at work.
> The answer for each component is different. Take the front derailleur,
> maybe it's not anodized because when campagnolo started making front ders,
> in '51? they didn't anodize anything, so ever since then, they didn't
> anodize front ders. The rear derailleur is anodized, maybe
> because by the time it was redesigned from bronze and chrome, they were
> already anodizing cranks, and so this new design would get anodized.(cut)

Sounds to me to be as good a reason as any...

"Same as it ever was... same as it ever was" --Talking Heads

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, SoCal

.