Re: [CR]off-topic(?) mystery bike

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 10:35:13 -0700
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]off-topic(?) mystery bike
References: <20030805115432.35834.qmail@web13004.mail.yahoo.com> <3F2FD55A.1050301@nonlintec.com>


Steve Maas wrote:
> (cut)
> It might be fun to be smug, and note that our older bikes are well past
> the infant-mortality stage, and thus more reliable. Unfortunately,
> however, a heavily used, 30-year-old bike is probably well into the
> end-of-life period, in terms of failure rates, for many of its
> components.

In my experience, finding a "heavily used" 30 year old bike would be the exception.

All the bikes I have seen that appear to be heavily used are in reality heavily weathered; the parts turn out to be barely worn.

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, CA

.