Re: [CR]Correction: 36T min TA Triple cranks

From: "jerrymoos" <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: <raleypc@netscape.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <17609D82.1F454644.00211578@netscape.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Correction: 36T min TA Triple cranks
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:36:44 -0600

That sounds like a 122, which was Stronglight 93 or a Stronglight 49 inner. Those could be TA arms with Stronglight 49 rings. Usually one sees the opposite combination. Don't think I've ever seen triple mod 49 rings, it was usually Stronglight 99 that was configured as a triple.

Regards,

Jerry Moos

----- Original Message -----
From: raleypc@netscape.net
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:37 AM
Subject: [CR]Correction: 36T min TA Triple cranks

> I goofed! It is not 144 BCD but rather is a BCD that allows for a minimum 36T inner chainring.
>
> Paul Raley
> Leonardtown MD
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> New! Unlimited Netscape Internet Service.
> Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register
> Act now to get a personalized email address!
>
> Netscape. Just the Net You Need.