Re: [CR]A nomenclature question

(Example: Humor)

In-Reply-To: <p0602043dbc5de0908207@[64.134.25.150]>
References: <310DF80C-64E6-11D8-87F1-000A95EEDD74@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:35:47 -0800
To: Sheldon Brown <CaptBike@sheldonbrown.com>
From: "joel metz, ifbma/sfbma" <magpie@messengers.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]A nomenclature question
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

i must say that i find it quite entertaining that you correct me here (a correction upon which we will have to agree to disagree, since it hinges on how we choose to define the noun "gear" and the adjective "fixed" - both of which have multiple possible meanings in this application):
>>though technically the opposite would be
>>"variable gear" (as in "variable hub gears").
>
>No, the opposite of freewheel is fixed gear.

yet have *this* quote in your signature :)
>| I still feel that variable gears are only for people over |
>| forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength |
>| of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailleur? |
>| We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear! |
>| --Henri Desgrange, _L'Šquipe_ article of 1902 |

hee hee

(oh yeah, and thanks for the french correction too - my eeeee key is a little overactive of late, and my french, eet ees not so good.)

-joel

--
joel metz : magpie@messengers.org : http://www.blackbirdsf.org/
bike messengers worldwide : ifbma : http://www.messengers.org/
po box 191443 san francisco california 94119-1443 usa
=
i know what innocence looks like - and it wasn't there,
after she got that bicycle...