Charles; I'd use 1970, as 1985 would be after the official cutoff date for the CR.
Peter(being slightly if not completely
sarcastic)Naiman
Shorewood, WI
> For the sake of discussion lets say a person at a
> young age bought a Hetchins in 1955 with campagnolo
> and cinelli parts. Rode the bike 15 years (1970) and
> needs new campagnolo and cinellii compotents due to
> all his original being worn out due to high miles
> per year. He goes to his local bike shop and they
> him what is current and improved over what he had
> before. Plus they don't have 15 year old parts to
> sell anyways.Rides the bike 15 years (1985) and
> needs new campagnolo and cinellii compotents due to
> all his original being worn out due to high miles
> per year. He goes to his local bike shop and they
> him what is current and improved over what he had
> before. Plus they don't have 15 year old parts to
> sell anyways. Rides the bike 15 years (2000)and
> needs new campagnolo and cinellii compotents due to
> all his original being worn out due to high miles
> per year. He goes to his local bike shop and they
> him what is current and improved over what he had
> before. Plus they don't have 15 year old parts to
> sell anyways. Which would be the correct group to
> use on this bicycle for a correct restoration,
> 1955, 1970, 1985, or 2000 compotents. I would say
> the last compotents he used would be the correct
> ones to use.
> Charles Nighbor
> Walnut Creek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Classicrendezvous mailing list
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>
http://www.bikelist.org/
>
===== Peter Naiman Alias Hetchinspete4420 North Ardmore AvenueShorewood, WI 53211-1418
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Classicrendezvous mailing list
Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
http://www.bikelist.org/