Re: [CR]Was Duopar now Success/Challenger II (Alu or Ti) ?

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:44:15 -0500
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: Classicrendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Was Duopar now Success/Challenger II (Alu or Ti) ?
References: <JJEEKLDDELHGFDGDBELBKECJCAAA.avitzur@013.net.il>
In-Reply-To:


Amir Avitzur wrote:
> Thanks for all the responses and photos.
> The derailleur I have looks like the one on
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/dhc.html
> It turns out that it is a Huret Success or Challenger II (Short cage version
> of Duopar?)
> (a Success is on http://www.yellowjersey.org/dhu.html)
> (a Challenger II is on http://www.yellowjersey.org/dhq.html)
>
> It has:
> "white" Alu cage
> black anodized body
> (the rear has Made in France and 1483 stamps on the back)
> black pear colored U-shaped plate holding the parallelogram body
> The upper plate, connected to the hanger, has an encircled T
> stamp)
>
> Does the T stamp indicate Titanium?
>
> Anybody have experience using these?
> Can they handle a F:52/38 R:14/28 combination?

The "T" stamp does indicate titanium. I've had one on one of my bikes for many years now. Until this spring I used 49/39 front and 14-24 in the back; I've now changed it to 45/32 in the front and 13-18 in the back. If you look closely, there are two mounting points for the pulley cage:

http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/success-close.jpg

The upper one is for freewheels up to 24T, the lower one is for freewheels up to 28T. I think it should work for you if you mount the pulley cage on the bottom position.

--

-John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA