Re: [CR]Tsk, Tsk Ted

(Example: Racing)

From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
To: <peterstorey@mindspring.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <E1DQ9nH-0000Dv-00@hall.mail.mindspring.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Tsk, Tsk Ted
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:20:44 -0700
reply-type=original

But we are going to use the OULDE (ANCIENNE) terms. Ted Ernst Palos Verdes Estates, CA


----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Storey
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 1:02 PM
Subject: [CR]Tsk, Tsk Ted



>
> Ted Ernst proposed:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>
>> I submit that if we are going to deal with beautiful timeline
>> bicycles and equipment, it would seem logical that we should
>> use vocabulary, terminology, expressions, and vernacular that
>> befits our era of expertise.
>> "Fixie" is a yuppie out of timeline vulgarism, and should be
>> banned forever from useage under penalty of excommunication.
>
> Orthographic improvisations such as "derailer" are equally deplorable.
> Intending no disrespect to Sheldon Brown, The Societe Brooklynnaise pour
> la
> Preservation du LL+U (SBPPLL+U, a shifty bunch by any standard) supports
> Ted
> unstintingly in this regard.
>
> Alas, Ted then proposed:
>
>> How about we start to define and begin to formalize terms
>> that are relevant and proper for afficionados of our favorite
>> hobby and pastime.
>
> But if WE do it, it's by definition out of timeline! Hmmmm.
>
> Could it be that a vocabulary consisting overwhelmingly of four or five
> generations of accumulated slang simply isn't suited to the Academie
> Francaise treatment?
>
> Peter "mech mec" Storey
> Founder - SBPPLL+U
> in chilly Brooklyn, NY