Re: [CR]Constructeurs? NOW Wave of the future

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Ideale)

Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:05:20 -0500
From: Marcus Coles <marcoles@ody.ca>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Constructeurs? NOW Wave of the future
References: <111320051535.15575.43775D4B000296B700003CD72206998499020E000A9C9D0A08@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <111320051535.15575.43775D4B000296B700003CD72206998499020E000A9C9D0A08@comcast.net>


hersefan@comcast.net wrote:

<much context removed>
>".....wide tires overall are likely to be faster than skinny tires which have HIGHER rolling resistance).
>
>
> You forget the important words "at the same pressure." At a given weight and pressure the contact patch is going to be pretty much the same area regardless of tire size, the wider tire has the rolling resistance advantage as the contact patch while the of the same area is shorter i.e. the flat spot is not as long. Due to structural reasons skinner tires generally can take more pressure which creates a smaller contact patch which can quickly overcomes the advantage of the wider tire.

It is all a compromise, there is I believe a sweet spot or zone depending on the rider, the road conditions and the weight carried.

Cobbles on a 21mm tire at 140 psi or a smooth steep climb on a 38mm tire at 50psi both would tire (pun not intended) me out pretty quickly and the reverse situation would be a definite improvement.

That said, it seems quite obvious to me that 1 1/4" or 32mm is THE perfect tire width, now how about that diameter I'm thinking 597mm. ;-)

Marcus Coles
London, Ontario, Canada