RE: [CR]One and one half inches-a crucial dimension.

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

Subject: RE: [CR]One and one half inches-a crucial dimension.
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 17:09:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20060805182917.0083e5f0@mailhost.oxford.net>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Topic: [CR]One and one half inches-a crucial dimension.
Thread-Index: Aca43ptq4gY1KLcASKqCA6wJqYBH2AADBYdA
From: "Mark Bulgier" <Mark@bulgier.net>
To: "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


John Betmanis wrote:
>
> Sutherland's 3rd edition gives the track chainline as 40mm
> for 110m rear spacing and 42.5mm for 120mm. That's off by approx. 1/8"

Campy agreed exactly with Sutherland's (or more realistically, the other way 'round) at least as of Catalog 17 - maybe earlier. I don't know how far back the 40 mm recommendation goes - anyone?

There's a good graphic of this in Catalog 17, on page 52, see it here if you don't have yours handy: http://bulgier.net/docs/bike/CampagnoloCatalog17.pdf (requires Adobe Acrobat Viewer)

Probable reasons for making it 40 mm instead of 38 mm (1-1/2") include the ability to use larger chainrings, and/or not needing such a deep dent in the outside of the right chainstay for c-ring clearance. Also slightly better bracing angle for the right-side spokes on the rear wheel.

Mark Bulgier
Seattle WA USA