Re: [CR]jack taylor thoughts?

(Example: Component Manufacturers)

Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:29:32 -0500
From: "sasha eysymontt" <sashae@gmail.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]jack taylor thoughts?
In-Reply-To: <e12ab577163bf.45a28c7e@optonline.net>
References: <1e4701b80701080834r3ce6ad81s1e44700d9174e702@mail.gmail.com> <8C9015BA71159D2-1640-483F@mblk-r17.sysops.aol.com>


On 1/8/07, joebz@optonline.net <joebz@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> For typical bikes the easy answer, without irritating the ListMeister, is
> often to be found in Mike Cone's guide on Sheldon Browns website
>
> http://www.sheldonbrown.com/vrbn-o-z.html#taylor
>
> That gives a baseline and then you can adjust for the condition,
> components and changes in the market since the guide was created. Mike would
> probably say the list is out of date, but it is still 90% accurate except at
> the top end (Masi, Colnago, Cinelli, De Rosa) which is up 50% or so.
> Remember that Mike's "guideline" condition is a darn nice bike. I suppose
> you could add $100 to the top for a decent all NR Campagnolo group on a bike
> also. Top production bikes with a big former ownership base (Raleigh,
> Peugeot, Schwinn), and therefore nostalgia value, are a bit stronger also.
> Track bikes are well up in all instances due to greater appreciation and
> trendiness. Odd or rare components are up. For example pantographed
> components, ICS. There is more general knowledge about the value of
> esoteric French parts.
>

Dale and Joe,

Thanks for the pointers, both. I haven't looked at older British bikes before, so I was primarily concerned about paying too much. I'm going to go see the bike in person to get a feel for it, so we'll see. The bike does look quite appealing.

thanks,

-s

---
,+'^'+ sasha eysymontt
sashae at gmail dot com - http://subtle.org/se
`+,.,+` new york city.