[CR]Re: [BOB] a low(er) trail experiment?

(Example: Production Builders:Pogliaghi)

In-Reply-To: <a06230982c23b0f33adbd@[192.168.1.33]>
References: <200704032357.l33Nvfaf027743@yojimg.net> <20070403175419.X62138@phred.org> <000101c77783$28513420$6501a8c0@maincomputer> <a0623096ec23abb5c2995@192.168.1.33> <eb5b4f6c0704051016v24d93760u8f99c724cf8874a0@mail.gmail.com> <a06230976c23ae1e4b507@192.168.1.33> <eb5b4f6c0704051049w7e267890rdab11f006b6be46e@mail.gmail.com> <a06230979c23ae8723e29@[192.168.1.33]> <77B9C92C-B438-4509-A0FA-4B20BE10EBA0@earthlink.net>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:50:42 -0700
To: CR RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: [CR]Re: [BOB] a low(er) trail experiment?

Jan Heine wrote: (snip)
> However, I have to admit that I haven't studied the Raleighs etc.,
> that served as inspiration here. My knowledge does not extend much
> further than the high-end custom bikes... which in most cases were
> racing-inspired.
>
> Might be a worth-while study, but another question is whether these
> bikes are at all optimized for their purposes.

I'd say, given that virtually all bike design is the result of trial and error, I'd have to say yes, these bikes, by definition, were optimized for their intended purpose.

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, CA USA
http://www.velo-retro.com (reprints, t-shirts & timelines)