Re: [CR]Time to put Old Paint down

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:10:52 -0400
From: "gabriel l romeu" <romeug@comcast.net>
To: Thomas Adams <thomasthomasa@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Time to put Old Paint down
References: <865767.17017.qm@web35610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <865767.17017.qm@web35610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Why else do museums spend
> lots of dough restoring old artwork to it's original appearance?
> That's how it was meant to look.

There is a lot of controversy about this in the art world, one of the reasons is the conjecture of how 'it is meant to look'. By candlelight

in a church? Through Manet's glaucoma?

I think that the legitimate restoration approach that is inarguable however, is for preservation. This restricts further degradation, a point which is inherent in other points of your argument and valid in our discipline as well.

I will happily buy you a beer at Cirque to argue with someone of your caliber Tom, but I don't really look at the paint while riding...

--
gabriel l romeu
missing a ride today waiting for tech support on a CNC mill which is
destined to do some drillium in
chesterfield nj usa
± http://studiofurniture.com Ø http://journalphoto.org ±