Re: RE: [CR]1981 Cinelli Laser?

(Example: Events)

Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: RE: [CR]1981 Cinelli Laser?
To: gholl@optonline.net
In-Reply-To: <e2869fe2e22.4640db17@optonline.net>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
cc: Classic Rendezvous

I was several hours behind reading mail. This discussion is ended.

Have a Nice Day,

Jerry Moos Big Spring, TX

gholl@optonline.net wrote:
    Dear Mr. Moos: As you know Dale has asked the members cease further discussion of this matter. The proper conduct of Dale's web-site is more important to me than the alleged presence or absence of a filler on another bike. I trust you share this feeling. Please eMail Dale if you wish to persist. I will not. Thanks, George Hollenberg MD


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerome & Elizabeth Moos"
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 03:56:00 -0000
Subject: Re: RE: [CR]1981 Cinelli Laser?
To: gholl@optonline.net, "Mark Bulgier"
Cc: "Classic Rendezvous"


> No one is contesting your assertion that your Laser has no
> bondo, But it was stated that Brian Baylis restored one and said
> that one had bondo. Brian is one of the best framebuildrs in
> the universe. If he says it was bondo, that one was bondo.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> ig Spring, TX
>
> gholl@optonline.net wrote:
> Dear Mr. Bulgier:
> I have carefully examined and applied a magnet to my Laser and
> found no bondo, or any similar product. In future I will publish
> pictures of the magnet applied to various parts of the surface.
> All I ask is a photo of a Laser showing evidence of bondo.
> Where's the beef?
> Sincerely,
> George Hollenberg MD
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Bulgier
> Date: Monday, May 7, 2007 9:01 pm
> Subject: RE: [CR]1981 Cinelli Laser?
> To: gholl@optonline.net, Chuck Schmidt
> Cc: Classic Rendezvous
>
> > George Hollenberg wrote:
> >
> > > [excerpted] in the absence
> > > of proof that bondo was used in the manufacture of the
> Cinelli Laser
> > > the characterization stands.
> > > If you can provide such proof, I will retract my remark forthwith.
> > > I repeat that no bondo was used on #007.
> >
> > Not saying you're wrong about your #007, but I am curious as
> to
> > how you
> > could know, without stripping the paint off? I didn't see your
> photos> so I have to ask, does yours have the aero fairing
> behind the
> > head tube?
> > If so, what do you propose it is made of?
> >
> > I agree it probably isn't Bondo brand bondo, but the two
> Lasers
> > I got to
> > hold a magnet to both had a fairing made of some non-ferrous
> material> that had a non-metallic-sounding thud when tapped. In
> other
> > words, it
> > walked like a bondo and quacked like a bondo, so I assumed it
> > was a
> > bondo or something closely akin to one. Of course I'm quite
> > open to any
> > evidence to the contrary.
> >
> > Mark Bulgier
> > Seattle WA USA
> >
>
> George Hollenberg MD
> CT, USA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>

George Hollenberg MD
CT, USA