Re: [CR]Campy thin vs thick BB?

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:17:01 -0500
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
To: CR <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Campy thin vs thick BB?
References: <942550.39538.qm@web38911.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <942550.39538.qm@web38911.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


dan kasha wrote:
> In setting up a proper BB for my track bike, I am trying to
> understand the campy NR thick vs thin BB cups.
>
> 1) Is there a way to visually tell what I have, or to measure
> something with a caliper?

The think cups are thick (~3mm) and have rifling inside the hole.
> 2) What is the reason for the thin vs the thick, is it to be able to
> get the crank closer in? Are both the fixed cup and the adjustable
> cup thinner?

Both cups are thicker to accommodate the rifling, which in turn is done as a means of expelling debris that collects on the spindle. You need the proper spindle to work with these cups, as the races are closer together than on an ordinary spindle.
> 3) Finally, why did other models use them, I think the tripples
> (again, is it for more clearance so the crank can be in closer?), and
> the GS cranks used them.

Nuovo Record and Super Record used the thick, rifled cups. Everthing else used the thin cups. The short-lived off-topic "off road" group from the early 90s also used thick cups, but a neoprene seal (like the on-topic Tange sealed cups) instead of rifling to keep contamination out of the BB.

--

-John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA