Re: [CR]Seat Post for Colnago

(Example: Production Builders:LeJeune)

Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:24:13 -0700
From: "John Wood" <braxton72@gmail.com>
To: "Richard Robinson" <robin.richard@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Seat Post for Colnago
In-Reply-To: <85282de40803051227x5f2f8031id77782e110a9a58e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <85282de40803051227x5f2f8031id77782e110a9a58e@mail.gmail.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Richard Robinson <robin.richard@gmail.com> wrote:
> for some reason the Colnago is
> still more than .5cm short. Does have to do with the seat tube angle?

It's my understanding that seat tube angle only effects stand over height, it will have no effect on BB to saddle distance. While a slack seat tube does lower the saddle, the saddle to pedal distance should remain the same, shouldn't it? And as far as I know, Colnago's were not known for their slack seat tubes, my Super seems to be in the 74 degree ballpark. Shorter cranks perhaps?

John Wood
Red Lodge, MT