Re: [CR]re: regina freewheels

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:02:01 -0700
From: "mike scammon" <mike@scammoncycles.com>
To: john@os2.dhs.org
Subject: Re: [CR]re: regina freewheels
In-Reply-To: <481871ED.2010401@new.rr.com>
References: <009401c8a7f6$6b7a4df0$6401a8c0@DELL> <d51ac5a60804292209h5af8614aoccaea3afecee81c3@mail.gmail.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

I just used the skewer method to hold the tool in place. Never had one slip. I agree they could have made the the prongs thicker from the beginning though.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 6:19 AM, John Thompson <johndthompson@gmail.com> wrote:
> mike scammon wrote:
>
> > Was it really flawed? Or did something just come out that was better?
>
> In the late 70s, Regina changed from the fragile 2-prong design to the
> same splined design used by Atom and Zeus.
>
> --
>
> -John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
> Appleton WI USA
> _______________________________________________
>

--
Mike Scammon
Menlo Park, Ca.