Re: [CR]Brinelled Headset Repair

(Example: Production Builders:LeJeune)

Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:28:31 -0400
To: "Classic Rendezvous" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
From: "John Betmanis" <johnb@oxford.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Brinelled Headset Repair
In-Reply-To: <006d01c8fb67$f5b1e9a0$4001a8c0@compaq>
References: <e649aa994607b.489f5335@optonline.net> <8801bb250808101512g1c8a2086m69f59f4a6c76ba8a@mail.gmail.com>


At 08:08 PM 10/08/2008 -0800, David Snyder wrote:
>I use
>full-compliment as in, iir, 24 balls. Not "full, then remove one" as I've
>heard many times over the years, but full.
>I tested this approach for needed clearance under load, and even with a
>disc-shim between a pair of balls, the loaded assembly rotated just fine.

You were probably just lucky in this particular application, but, obviously, you shim test proved it works. Normally, I think, removing one ball is standard practice because without testing as you did, it's quite possible that what appears to be a full complement is actually overcrowding.
>Lastly, adjustment is critical, and one will ideally make final headset
>adjustments on the headset with but a naked stem's quill fully torqued in
>place.

However, the inertia of the bars and front wheel can easily mask any tightness in the adjustment.

John Betmanis
Woodstock, Ontario
Canada