Re: [CR]Bike ID, provenance, research etc.

(Example: History:Norris Lockley)

From: <LouDeeter@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:37:39 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]Bike ID, provenance, research etc.
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


sbirmingham@mindspring.com writes:


> "What's really needed is a good visual guide to the traits of particular
> builders over time, gathered into
> one place. Maybe even something a bit more permanent than a website. For
> most of what's typically collected,
> it shouldn't be too hard since the popular brands were produced in
> relatively significant numbers, and there's
> enough information to gather. The custom nature of some bikes, especially
> ones from earlier in a builders career
> before they got into series production will always cause problems, but other
> information could prove the exceptions. I'm thinking of things like odd
> features on a bike that otherwise has all the right traits."
> This was exactly what I had in mind in the mid-80s when I began to compile information that later became the Used Bike Buyers Guide. I had come across a used bike I had never heard of in a local shop--a Romic. This was before the Internet, or at least the one I began to use around the mid-90s. Al Gore may have invented an earlier version. But, I wandered. In my first attempt at describing various bikes, the goal was to be able to describe features that would help a buyer if the frame had no engraving or decals. I felt surely that a single builder would use a standard way of joining the seatstays. I was terribly wrong. I also found that model designs changed regularly, keeping the same model name. I also found over time that I knew a lot less than I thought I did. The High Tech Bicycle, The Custom Bicycle, Bicycling Magazine, Bicycle Guide--all those provided food for thought and stoked the interest. I still add makes when I find information--usually someone sending me a link or seeing a new bike on Ebay, so the Guide is alive. The guide has over 150 pages and probably over a thousand builders listed, with thousands more models. But, my information was very limited prior to 1980. While I applaud someone who wants to take a project on to actually catalog all the different models of various builders, over time and by model, I believe it would be a lifelong project and then would still not catch nuances from the rare, custom build. Dale's http://www.classicrendezvous.com, the Wool Jersey site, and a few other sites that I don't have on the tip of my brain, provide a valuable tool for the researcher--available on the net. Jan Heine's The Golden Age of Handbuilt Bicycles is another excellent resource for a specific type of bike--the French Randonneur. The Used Bike Buyers Guide isn't on the net and I no longer publish it in paper. And, it has no pictures, so Steve's desire for a "visual guide" would come up short with the guide. My belief is that for every "sure thing" you could find on a builder's characteristics, someone will find one that doesn't fit the mold. Maybe someone with more time than I have will undertake such a project. Lou Deeter, Orlando FL USA

************** It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.

(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)