RE: [CR]Was: Baylis' frame. Now: Bruce Gordon's Ti bike.

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

In-Reply-To: <0DFF65258A43481899D476A56E01C7E1@BruceGordon>
References: <0DFF65258A43481899D476A56E01C7E1@BruceGordon>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:52:43 -0700
To: <bgcycles@svn.net>, "'Dale Brown'" <oroboyz@aol.com>
From: "Jan Heine" <heine94@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: [CR]Was: Baylis' frame. Now: Bruce Gordon's Ti bike.
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

>"""I'd consider the bike art, rather than a truly practical machine.
>Bruce's bikes always are a highlight of the shows."""""
>
>I ride it almost every day - I would not display a bike that is not 100%
>rideable!!
>
>Regards,
>Bruce Gordon
>www.bgcycles.com

Bruce,

I did not mean to imply that the bike was not rideable. I just think that the stem/headset adjustment, while supremely elegant, might be considered less than ideal if you have to overhaul the headset the night before a ride.

As you know, Bicycle Quarterly is quite critical when we think something is not much good. And your bike was featured without criticism...

Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
140 Lakeside Ave #C
Seattle WA 98122
http://www.bikequarterly.com