Re: [CR] Bicycle Quarterly's Braking issue, 'Modern Racing Brakes'

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli:Laser)

Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:21:16 +0100
From: "M-gineering" <info@m-gineering.nl>
References: <001c01c97929$6b1ef220$2f01a8c0@danbarbpc>
In-Reply-To: <001c01c97929$6b1ef220$2f01a8c0@danbarbpc>
Cc: Classic Rendezvous <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] Bicycle Quarterly's Braking issue, 'Modern Racing Brakes'


Barb and Dan Artley wrote:
> I finished reading the latest bicycle quarterly a few days ago and was
> very impressed with the history and advances of braking technology. I
> learned a lot. I do have to question an item that Jan brought up in
> Chapter 4, Modern Racing Brakes, describing the Campagnolo sidepull as
> being a step backward in brake technology. 'Campagnolo's brake offered
> adequate perfomance, but it did not compare favorably to a good
> centerpull brake. The famous line was invented that these bakes did not
> stop the bike, but just "modulated speed".'
>

In the peloton you'll crash if you run in to something, but also when you're struck from behind. That the brakes needed a concentrated effort to get real retardation was considered a safety feature -- mvg

Marten Gerritsen
Kiel Windeweer
Netherlands