Re: [CR] Collecting and appreciating the extremely rare

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

From: "Dave Porter" <frogeye@porterscustom.com>
To: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <003201c9f269$5d231d40$176957c0$@net> <302B2370E8E145EB8E65C88C4A9A8279@oscar> <001301c9f2ea$e4d01140$0a00a8c0@corp.rfweston.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:37:46 -0600
Thread-Index: Acny6qTsqJKQXMsPRvGCNruOgKGPnwASCUUQ
In-Reply-To: <001301c9f2ea$e4d01140$0a00a8c0@corp.rfweston.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] Collecting and appreciating the extremely rare


Snip> I would guess that it is one part financial climate and two parts (or more) that most of us only buy riders, tend not to

spend big dollars on them and would have a hell of a time bending our aging bodies over a funny bike.

This is, perhaps, typical of collectors, but seems to fly in the face of the word "collector".
   Point, being that here was an offering of racing machines, now banned and therefore very unlikely to be made again. Not unlike buying a painting by a dead artist. That usually increases prices.
   While I'm not dead, nor is Chris Kvale or Keith Anderson, etc. it's not like there were a gazillion Funny Bikes made by custom builders.. ergo that makes them more collectible in my mind.
   Gary, in another reply, suggests that I don't sell the collection. That's good advice and I'm going to take it. The frames are great display items to show customers. Who knows, maybe we'll get a track here before I AM dead... :>) DaveP
   Incidentally, a well designed Funny Bike is quite easy to ride. They were made to go fast in a straight line, not turn, descend, or climb. The rider position is no more radical, else rider performance would suffer and negate the whole point.