Re: [CR] virgin 531 Puch

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:43:13 -0700
From: "sandranian" <sandranian@yahoo.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <p.stock@stocknet.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4A96B67A.6060505@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] virgin 531 Puch


Ride it! It's a bicycle!

My 2 cents.

Stephan Andranian Costa Mesa, California, USA http://www.GitaneUSA.com

_____________________________________

This E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This information is confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.


--- On Thu, 8/27/09, pstock wrote:


From: pstock <pjstock@gmail.com> Subject: [CR] virgin 531 Puch To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 9:38 AM

I keep staring at this 531 frame Puch trying to figure out if it really has never been ridden, as appears to be the case.

http://picasaweb.google.com/TOcycles/Puch

There is not a scratch on the frame nor fleck of dirt or grease in the drive train. (the dust you see is just loose, from storage. I should wrap it up.)

The question then I guess, should I just keep it off the road? while I have no plan to sell it, is its value significantly enhanced if it has never hit pavement?

and does anyone know anything about this model. My sense is Puch was like the Schwinn of Austria and made some pretty mediocre bikes. But this one has some extraordinary details and components.

Peter Stock
Toronto Canada