Re: [Classicrendezvous] Laing stays are an Affectation?

From: "Richard Rose" <rmrose@toast.net>
To: "Jerry Moos" <moos@penn.com>, "Harvey M Sachs" <sachs@erols.com>
Cc: <OROBOYZ@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.1.20001010104240.00af8ed0@pop.erols.com> <39E337AF.7EEAA3AD@penn.com>
Subject: Re: [Classicrendezvous] Laing stays are an Affectation?
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 03:31:51 -0400

But more what? Richard (less is usually more), Rose - unless its TIG! Toledo, Ohio

----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Moos
To: Harvey M Sachs
Cc: OROBOYZ@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Classicrendezvous] Laing stays are an Affectation?

> acquire at least one example of this wretched excess.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry "Sometimes more is more" Moos