Re: [CR]Flying Scot frame 69H

(Example: Racing:Beryl Burton)

Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:47:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [CR]Flying Scot frame 69H
From: "Bob Reid" <bob.reid1@virgin.net>
To: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <E145Vku-0006ND-00@trolley.tesco.net>


The bit about the restriction on the names on frames came from Cycling's 100th anniv. issue - a rule (by the BLRC ?) that was introduced in 1938 - or is this just another "popular-cycling-myths-of-our-time" like the reason for so-called "fancy" frames.

The short named "Scot" was a particular model and club "legend" has it that the full name was used only on the touring-angle "club" frames (though I've never been able to substantiate that)

Now all I'll have to do is find a complete set a Simplex levers etc......

Bob Reid Stonehaven Scotland.


> From: "Hilary Stone" <Hilary.Stone@Tesco.net>
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:41:24 +0000
> To: Bob Reid <bob.reid1@virgin.net> , Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: Re: [CR]Flying Scot frame 69H
>
> These cable runs not surprisingly are for Simplex cable operated front and
> rear derailleurs. Simplex offered a front double lever which worked just off
> a right hand boss. And there were two front derailleurs which could be used
> this way ­ the JUY 56 and another earlier one from about 1953. The rear
> derailleur could be anything from a Tour de France, JUY 51 or others right
> up until the end of the push rod convolute spring gears in 1960/1.
> There were no restrictions preventing any form of advertising on frames
> in the 1950s ­ it was probably somebody's personal choice.

> Regards

> Hilary