Re: [CR]So what's a 1st edition SR rear der worth? (Ebay)

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

From: "Takao Noda" <tanoda@d1.dion.ne.jp>
To: "Classic Bike List" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <SM2501@aol.com>
References: <3a.e3696e6.276b9cb1@aol.com> <000a01c066bc$2434d1a0$2907ffd2@pcgxrgseries>
Subject: Re: [CR]So what's a 1st edition SR rear der worth? (Ebay)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 23:21:26 +0900


I think It was easy for Campagnolo to meet some special order to make 1st edition style SR derailleurs. Cage plates were same as Nuovo Record . Other parts were same as new type SR. Necessary parts were the old style arms and probably it had them as redundunt stock of spare parts.
    As is often the case, I find the older Pat. 77 is better made than Pat.83.
                           Takao Noda
                  Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan


---- Original Message -----
From: Takao Noda
To: Classic Bike List
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]So what's a 1st edition SR rear der worth?


(Ebay)


> I have two 1st edition SR rear derailleurs. One is Pat.77 on my
> Lupo and the one is Pat. 83 on my Galmozzi1983. When I ordered SR
> group in early 1984 , the shop asked whether I liked older type
> or new type and I ordered the older one because I thought the
> older type rear derailleur matched better the new type(partly
> black) SR front derailleur. So the seller's comment that it was
> made for only one year is not correct.
> Takao Noda
> Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan