There seems to be strong desire to place things in boxes by labeling them "art", "engineering", "science" , "architecture", etc. As Jerry points out, does the intended use or functionality preclude something from being artistic? Why would automobiles (and bikes) be on display in the Guggenheim if not for their beauty? Isn't beauty what it's all about?
Isn't it possible to render a concept in such a striking manner that the beholder is seized by the beauty of it and its harmony with its environment? As an engineer and designer, beauty is near the top of my list, right there with "Form follows function". "Have no object in your home if it is not beautiful" (F.L.Wright)
People occasionally ask what my criteria are for design. I defer to greater designers than myself.
1. It must be functional (Edison, Ford, and others) 2. "Everything should be a simple as possible, but no simpler." (A. Einstein) 3. Inasmuch as possible, it must bring joy to the user. "Have no object in your home if it is not beautiful." (F.L.Wright)
"Elegance" is the heart of the second criteria. Beauty is the heart of the third.
Just adding my fuel to this fire......
Sid "Heading for Hell Week in the hills of Texas, Yaahoooo!" Smith