Dennis Ryan wrote:
>
Time was
> when most American cyclist would've been surprised to see American-built
> bikes classed with the best from Britain, France, Italy or Japan. Today we
> rule, but it didn't happen overnight (thanks Richard, Grant, Brian, Matt,
> Albert ...)
I'd have to take issue with you here, Dennis, over your claim that Americans "rule" when it comes to frame building.
I haven't seen any American-built frames but I'm prepared to take the word of all those on the list who say they're the best.
However, to say that Americans rule is to suggest that they are inherently better builders. This I would dispute.
US built frames cost a fortune in comparison with those in the UK. That seems to me largely, but not exclusively, a result of the huge amount of time expended in profiling and shaping lugs.
Since this craftsmanship isn't exactly on the same level of complexity as quantum theory, I would submit it is achievable by gifted builders prepared to spend similar amounts of time and attention to the task.
UK builders are quite capable of that but the home market does not demand what would be seen as an unnecessary expense.
While UK collectors appreciate beautifully built bikes as much as anyone else, there is simply not a market here for such expensive machines, especially when the likes of a Hetchins or Ephgrave can readily be had for a fraction of the price.
With the greatest of respect to Brian, Richard, etc., who seem to be wonderful and highly-skilled craftsmen, I think some of our guys, and many from continental Europe, could produce the same work if the financial returns on their time were adequate.
So while I might concede-since I've no evidence to the contrary-that US bikes are the best traditionally made machines available, I do not, for what it's worth, agree that Americans rule.
Bruce.
Get your free email with GroupWeb Worldmailer at http://www.worldmailer.com. Send and receive e-mail from any computer with a web browser.