RE: [CR]RE: Masi vs. Waterford

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

From: "kevin weitzel" <>
To: "Diane Feldman" <>
Cc: <>
Subject: RE: [CR]RE: Masi vs. Waterford
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:40:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <002801c130a2$67b78480$>

Tom Ooooh! This is such an easy question (s). If I were an auto collector and had a 1946 Plymouth, I would have a great automobile. True? However, since the acquisition of Plymouth by Chrysler and then a conglomeration of Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, Jeep, Eagle, and AMC I would say that there isn't a Plymouth today that has that same mystique or 'history.' I mean, would you consider my Plymouth Breeze a car that offers 'history' as part of the purchase? O.K. I guess if you count the Prowler you may have an arguement but that is not a car for the averagage man/person. I equal this to Waterford. Changing the name and producing high quality bike frames isn't history. Mercedes has changed year after year with innovation after innovation, yet they still have true and well established history. They are still sought after as the/a car to have. When collecting or buying for value, history, or a simple investment... Masi comes to mind. I am sorry, as I don't want to offend a Waterford owner, but Waterford AINT no Masi when it comes to this regard. Fineto'

Kevin Weitzel

NetZero Platinum
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!