Re: [CR]Who really used Ti?

(Example: Framebuilding:Restoration)

From: "Rick Chasteen" <rchasteen@kc.rr.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <A9CF4EB95BC44C44A94CA51AF3FE90FEB91B@server.normandassociates.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Who really used Ti?
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:05:41 -0500


----- Original Message ----- From: Rich Rose <rrose@normandassociates.com> To: Tom Dalton <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>; <OROBOYZ@aol.com> Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: RE: [CR]Who really used Ti?


>but it does seem to me that TI
>is sold as "the very best" / "longest lasting", etc.., which is contrary
>to the needs of the pro peleton, perhaps, in this age of throw-away's?
>Richard Rose (rainy & cold in Toledo)

Richard:

I think you're absolutely right, here. The appeal of Ti is Durability, light weight, and a sweet (steel like) ride.

Rick Chasteen, Kansas City