Re: [CR]Fastback seatstays?! Was: Trek TX900 Frame Ebay# 1018754618

(Example: Framebuilders:Masi)

From: "James A Narlesky" <jim@alandavid.com>
To: "Lee Berg" <lberg@ventoux.com>, "classicrendezvous" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <62.15a30e78.29020ea0@aol.com> <3BD0B74F.7AE9258B@ventoux.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Fastback seatstays?! Was: Trek TX900 Frame Ebay# 1018754618
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:56:29 -0700


Lee,

O.K. I'll weigh in on this one. The seat cluster on a Cinelli "Speciale Corsa" looks pretty nice to me. Although they are contoured more near the pinch bolt than those on the Trek. Can anyone really tell or feel the difference between the different styles of seat stay attachment when riding a bike? Comparisons of different makers frames would have too many variables to judge objectively.

Jim Narlesky
San Jose


----- Original Message -----
From: Lee Berg
To: classicrendezvous
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]Fastback seatstays?! Was: Trek TX900 Frame Ebay# 1018754618



> I should have been more specific: I'm referring to the type of fastback
> seatstays used on this Trek, the type I believe was invented (or at
> least popularized) by Cinelli, where the seatstays are attached at the
> seatpost binder (and are pinched together by the binder bolt). (I am
> not referring to "fastback" seatstays attached some other way, e.g.,
> mitered and brazed to the back of the seatlug or seattube.)

>

> Lee Berg

> Palo Alto