Re: [CR]hetchins serial no.

(Example: Framebuilders:Chris Pauley)

Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:57:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [CR]hetchins serial no.
From: "Hilary Stone" <Hilary.stone@tesco.net>
To: OROBOYZ@aol.com, rebour@hotmail.com, rydjor@smig.net, GRIFFKS@aol.com
CC: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


Dale is quite right, Hetchins numbers are not at all straight forward and they certainly do not all have the H prefix. Frame numbering sequences were changed at least once and different prefixes were added. Contact me for queries on any Hetchins. I will also put you in touch with the guy who keeps the Hetchins register but at present I don't have his e-mail address. Regards Hilary Stone

----------

>From: OROBOYZ@aol.com

>To: rebour@hotmail.com, rydjor@smig.net, GRIFFKS@aol.com

>Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

>Subject: Re: [CR]hetchins serial no.

>Date: Wed, Feb 7, 2001, 9:45 pm

>


> In a message dated 2/7/01 4:22:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,

> rebour@hotmail.com writes:

>

> << In most cases from the early 50's to the early 60's, the numbers following

> the "H" in the serial number is the year in reverse. For example, and H2504

> would be a '52 Hetchins, 4604 would be a '64 Hetchins, and so on. That idea

> was eventually dropped sometime in the early 60's, and the straightforward

> method was employed, i.e. H70314 is a 1970 Frame, number 314 of that year. I

> would guess that your bike is a 1970, judging by this numbering method and

> the componentry on it. >>

>

> Hmmm. Ken and gang, this viewpoint is not borne out in what I have read and

> observed.. According to my info, for instance, Hetchins made in 1952 would be

> a number of combinations which do not fit that:

>

> 1952 numbers (which was an odd year) = E24025- E224459 and T24460 - T24508

> and H24509- H24644.

> Oddly 1951 used all "H" prefixes .. H13721 - H14024.

>

> Quite a complicated business, eh?

> Dale Brown