Re: [CR]Mario Confente (was inconsequential bollocks)

(Example: Framebuilders:Norman Taylor)

Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:53:48 EST
From: <LouDeeter@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Mario Confente (was inconsequential bollocks)
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Bob Reid <bob.reid@btconnect.com> writes:

<< I'm saddened to see that yet again we are descending into the depths of the "framebuilding is art rather than just light engineering" discussion group ?

Bob, while I agree with some of the thought behind your message about the need to get on with it, the CR List wouldn't exist if framebuilding wasn't a form of art. If I just wanted to look at old bikes, I'd join a balloon tire bike group! I can't imagine that you continue to follow the Flying Scot because it is just a nice riding bike. Also, there is a lot of money and time spent in America (perhaps not Scotland) watching soap operas & afternoon talk shows. Perhaps this dialogue on Masi-Medici-Simonetti-Baylis-Cunningham-Allen-Confente is similar to How the World Turns or the Opra show. I know I anxiously tune in each morning to get the next episode. I regret the personal part of the emails too, but I've learned more about the 70s Southern California framebuilding "cult" than I would have had this not surfaced. Jim Cunningham and Brian Baylis have made immeasureable contributions to our hobby and these emails haven't taken away from that. How they got to their current ! state of perfection is of intere st, even if it is a bit soddy. Lou "saying what I really think" Deeter, Huntsville AL