[OT] - RANT - was Re: [CR]RE Photopoint

(Example: Framebuilders:Tubing:Columbus)

Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 05:58:57 -0700
Subject: [OT] - RANT - was Re: [CR]RE Photopoint
From: "Steven L. Sheffield" <stevens@veloworks.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010408054646.92311.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com>


Why do people have a problem paying for a service that's they're using?

Photopoint is a business. How do you expect them to stay in business if no one pays for the services they're offering?

You've used it for free for months now ... and the $19.95 per year they're planning to gives you 12 free prints of some of the photos you have stored.

There is a less expensive option of $9.95 per year, which does not include the 12 free prints ... that's less than $0.83 per month. Is it going to kill anyone to cough up a measly $0.83 per month to continue using a service that has been beneficial to all of us?

--

Steven L. Sheffield stevens at veloworks dot com veloworks at earthlink dot net aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash