My very early Santana has short stoker top tube syndrome. It took a few years I guess for Santana to sort things out.
Joe
At 08:32 PM 4/11/01 -0400, gregparker1 wrote:
>I tend to agree with Chuck about there being no vintage tandem collectors.
>Witness the old, cool Paramount tandems that sometimes show up on eBay and
> also tend to get no bids. They look really nice, but are usually not real
>easy to handle, nor are they particularly comfortable for the stoker with
>their significantly shorter rear top tubes than more recent frames.
>
>I think the problem is that tandem technology has become far more advanced
>since Santana went into production in 1976, and in particular the frames are
> much more efficient (and comfortable) than they were back in the "pre-
>boom" years. Tandem sales in the US have increased something like tenfold
in the
>last decade or so I seem to recall.
>
>Greg Parker
>A2 Michigan, where at least we aren't having any tornados (so far...).
>
>P.S. Anyone want a custom Nobilette 531 tandem in 18"F / 19"R c-t size
w/NR tandem cranks,
>Phil 40-hole hubs / BBs & rear disc brake in near-mint condition for
$2100? If so, please
> contact me off-list.
>
>Chuck Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>Pogliaghi tandems were pretty amazing in their constuction details.
>Described in the Custom Bicycle book as being built up with oversize
>tubing to fabricate the lugs (oversize tubing frame cut up to form lugs
>for smaller sized tubing).
>
>My conclusion is that there aren't any vintage tandem collectors out
>there (vintage tandems were very whippy).
>
>Chuck Schmidt
>South Pasadena, California
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>----------------------- Internet Header --------------------------------
>Sender: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org
>Received: from catfood.nt.phred.org (catfood.phred.org [216.39.149.190])
> by spdmgaae.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) with ESMTP id SAA04893
> for <gregparker1@compuserve.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:12:14 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from phred.org ([216.39.149.189]) by catfood.nt.phred.org with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2883);
> Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:07:46 -0700
>Delivered-To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>Received: from catfood.nt.phred.org (catfood.phred.org [216.39.149.190])
> by phred.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9925B7591
> for <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.121.50]) by
catfood.nt.phred.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2883);
> Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:06:53 -0700
>Received: from 209.178.161.125 (pool0131.cvx5-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net
[209.178.152.131])
> by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA17991
> for <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-ID: <3AD4E468.2506@earthlink.net>
>From: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: chuckschmidt@earthlink.net
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>Subject: Re: [CR]Pogliaghi Tandem on E-Bay
>References: <15.1284e3d8.2806278c@aol.com>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Apr 2001 22:06:53.0859 (UTC)
FILETIME=[B77B8F30:01C0C2D3]
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Sender: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org
>Errors-To: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org
>X-BeenThere: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Help: <mailto:classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org?subject=help>
>List-Post: <mailto:classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
>List-Subscribe: <http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous>,
> <mailto:classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org?subject=subscribe>
>List-Id: A sharing of vintage lightweight bicycle information and lore
<classicrendezvous.bikelist.org>
>List-Unsubscribe:
<http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous>,
> <mailto:classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: http://www.bikelist.org/
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:10:49 -0800