Re: [CR]Teledyne questions and appeal

(Example: Events)

Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:46:31 -0800
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Teledyne questions and appeal
References: <ABC4A5183996D411BF92000629EEABAD366267@mail-server.urc.com> <3AD4D88F.6824@earthlink.net> <3AD51430.FEF346EE@penn.com> <001b01c0c358$8564fba0$6cf9fea9@jim2> <000801c0c394$f4e21fd0$856b1dd0@VPPLANNING>


Jerry Moos wrote:
>
> My point was that a frame with excessive flex would have less stable and
> less predictable handling and might be harder to keeep upright in
> unfavorable road condition. I feel less confident of the Teledyne's
> handling on the gravel roads in this area because it has noticeably greater
> frame flex. I suspect the Speedwell, with what appear to be smaller OD
> tubes than the Titan, would probably have even more flex. While one wants
> some absorption of shock on rough roads, I'd think a large amount of lateral
> flex in a frame woud make it more difficult to control on rough or wet
> roads.

Frames with lots of flex do not exhibit less predictable handling; you adapt to the frames handling characteristics and you ride within those capabilities, just as you adapt to wet roads that are slick or wet brakes that take a longer distance to stop.

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, California