RE: [CR]Bike technology peaked in the 1984?

(Example: Framebuilders:Chris Pauley)

From: "Richard Rose" <rrose@NormandAssociates.com>
To: "'Capt. Crunch'" <afhost@veriomail.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: RE: [CR]Bike technology peaked in the 1984?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:32:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <005b01c0c9b7$cfa8fad0$1b765bcf@ANDYH>


O.K., that makes sense to me. So, the question is, if a GEL 280 weighs 300 gr., how much does a Reflex weigh? Does it make a difference? Especially when compared to the guy on my right who outweighs me by 20lbs. Or the Woman on my left who weighs 50 lbs. Less! Richard (165) Rose

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of Capt. Crunch Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 12:35 PM To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR]Bike technology peaked in the 1984?

A couple of points:

IIRC correctly the GEL280 weighs 280 w/o the ferrules. True rim weight is closer to 300. Can anyone confirm this?

I would suspect that the freewheel/hub combination weighs more than the freehub/cog combo. Therefore the older set of wheels probably has lighter rims and heavier hubs. The new wheels are the opposite.

Total weight of a wheelset is not most important performance factor. Reducing the weight of the wheel/tire gains the most performance. Many modern boutique wheels give the illusion of light (performance) weight by reducing the weight of the hubs.

Andy Hosterman