Re: [CR]Re: 1936 Hetchins

(Example: Humor)

In-Reply-To: <002401c100c5$85986940$6807ffd2@pcgxrgseries>
References: <F1552h2jXi2QdUeGrIs00010f49@hotmail.com> <a04320402b7625fc545d4@[192.168.1.2]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 05:15:59 +0900
To: "Classic Bike List" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
From: "kenji fusejima" <QYP02710@nifty.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: 1936 Hetchins


Hello Noda-san;

Thanks for your information. I read twice "Cycling" Magazine 1936. There were written about "No.1" frame that is "specially filed and cut-away lugs". It seems that "No.1" frame was not build by Chater-Lea lugs.

At 3:00 AM +0900 01.6.30, Takao Noda wrote:
>konbanha, ... I 'd better write in English.
> I have found Brilliant No.2 below No.1 on a page of catalog. It
>seems there is a difference in the description about frames.
>There are written " Charter Lea lugs" on No.2 and No. 3 but not
>written on No.1. Is it the diference of lugs? What was written
>about lugs in " Cycling" 1936?
> Takao Noda
> Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan