Re: [CR]Classic cut off criteria

Example: Framebuilders
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:54:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [CR]Classic cut off criteria
From: "Steven L. Sheffield" <>
To: <>
In-Reply-To: <000a01c1b811$1f4bca20$a9bb56d1@Marta>

"Brifters" ... now there's a word that needs to die.


Steven L. Sheffield, USA stevens at veloworks dot com veloworks at mac dot com aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash

> From: "garth libre" <>
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:13:33 -0500
> To: <>
> Subject: [CR]Classic cut off criteria
> 3) Bar end shifters, down tube shifters and even (UGGH) stem shifters are all
> plainly classic. (Well maybe not stem shifters, I am not sure, but I am sure I
> hate them. Nothing could be less classic than brifters, STI, Ergo or whatever
> delicate garbage the industry tries to force consumers to swallow. I think I
> could swallow a downtube lever and safely eliminate it, but those brifters
> would certainly cause a trip to the emergency room.