Right, different pressed-in races, spindles (of course), adj. races, and balls. All other parts the same. I think the catalog #'s would probably bear this out.
Tom
> so the bodies are the same, but the pressed in
\r?\n> races, and the guts, are different?
\r?\n> e-RICHIE
\r?\n> upstairs, but in chester
\r?\n>
\r?\n>
\r?\n> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 07:52:12 -0800 (PST) Tom Dalton
\r?\n> <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com> writes:
\r?\n> > I recall a series of posts on this issue not long
\r?\n> ago.
\r?\n> > One listmember pointed out that the bodies that
\r?\n> made
\r?\n> > it onto the SR pedals had a nicer finish. Who
\r?\n> knows
\r?\n> > if this was true at all times, or nver, or if some
\r?\n> of
\r?\n> > the SR pedals got special treatment and others
\r?\n> didn't.
\r?\n> > It would not be unlike Campy to put a "special
\r?\n> > finish" on some early SR pedals and then get tired
\r?\n> of
\r?\n> > the extra work and revert back to the standard
\r?\n> > finish... or for the quality of the standard
\r?\n> finish to
\r?\n> > vary considerably over time.
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > The pressed-in races on the SR pedals are
\r?\n> different
\r?\n> > from all the others because they are made for use
\r?\n> with
\r?\n> > 1/8" balls insted of the 5/32" balls of the NR/SL
\r?\n> > pedals. I am virtually certain that the pedal
\r?\n> bodies
\r?\n> > are all machined the same way and will accept
\r?\n> either
\r?\n> > race.
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > Tom Dalton
\r?\n> > Bethlehem, PA
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > --- David Bilenkey <dbilenkey@sympatico.ca> wrote:
\r?\n> > > I was aware that there was a difference and that
\r?\n> the
\r?\n> > > guts of the Ti and
\r?\n> > > steel spindle versions were not interchangeable,
\r?\n> but
\r?\n> > > I'd suspect (from a
\r?\n> > > manufacturing standpoint) that the main body
\r?\n> casting
\r?\n> > > would have been the
\r?\n> > > same, perhaps with slightly different internal
\r?\n> > > machining. From all the
\r?\n> > > pedals I've seen the black alloy cages appear to
\r?\n> be
\r?\n> > > the same (for both Ti
\r?\n> > > and steel spindled)....
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > Just looking at a handy Ti pedal (50th) and a
\r?\n> couple
\r?\n> > > other SL pedals there
\r?\n> > > is no real visible external difference in the
\r?\n> > > casting or cage.
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > David Bilenkey
\r?\n> > > Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > -----Original Message-----
\r?\n> > > From: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org
\r?\n> > > [mailto:classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org]On
\r?\n> > > Behalf Of Richard M
\r?\n> > > Sachs
\r?\n> > > Sent: February 25, 2002 8:33 AM
\r?\n> > > To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
\r?\n> > > Subject: Re: [CR]Campy quill pedal question
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > also:
\r?\n> > > the sr ti spindles and guts don't fit in either
\r?\n> of
\r?\n> > > the nr pedals,
\r?\n> > > the 1037 or the 1037a. so there must be more to
\r?\n> it
\r?\n> > > than that
\r?\n> > > the same black cage was used for both types.
\r?\n> > > can anyone verify this?
\r?\n> > > e-RICHIE
\r?\n> > > on north main st
\r?\n> > >
\r?\n> > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:04:37 -0800 Bill Bryant
\r?\n> > > <Bill_Bryant@prodigy.net>
\r?\n> > > writes:
\r?\n> > > > Yes, you are indeed correct; I erroneously
\r?\n> > > overlooked that
\r?\n> > > > short-lived
\r?\n> > > > version--perhaps for understandable reasons.
\r?\n> ;-)
\r?\n> > > > OTOH, I wrote that "Classic Campy" pedals are
\r?\n> the
\r?\n> > > same except for
\r?\n> > > > the cages. I
\r?\n> > > > would offer that the Ti SR version fell
\r?\n> somewhat
\r?\n> > > outside that
\r?\n> > > > category and
\r?\n> > > > belong in an exotic group, not the classic
\r?\n> one.
\r?\n> > > >
\r?\n> > > > Bill Bryant
\r?\n> > > > Santa Cruz.
\r?\n> > > >
\r?\n> > > >
\r?\n> > > >
\r?\n> > > > Questor wrote:
\r?\n> > > >
\r?\n> > > > > I believe that Campy briefly marketed
\r?\n> titanium
\r?\n> > > axles for the
\r?\n> > > > Superleggera
\r?\n> > > > > black alloy pedals. Because they proved to
\r?\n> be
\r?\n> > > too brittle and
\r?\n> > > > cracked
\r?\n> > > > > easily, Campy converted in 1978 to all-steel
\r?\n> > > axles. Yes, there
\r?\n> > > > are
\r?\n> > > > > additional differences!
\r?\n> > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
\r?\n> > > > > From: "Bill Bryant"
\r?\n> <Bill_Bryant@prodigy.net>
\r?\n> > > > > To: "Jon M. Schaer"
\r?\n> <jschaer@columbus.rr.com>
\r?\n> > > > > Cc: "Classic Rendezvous"
\r?\n> > > <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
\r?\n> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 8:22 PM
\r?\n> > > > > Subject: Re: [CR]Campy quill pedal question
\r?\n> > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > > Classic Campy pedals are all the same on
\r?\n> the
\r?\n> > > inside. The only
\r?\n> > > > difference
\r?\n> > > > > is the
\r?\n> > > > > > chrome steel cage versus black anodized
\r?\n> alloy
\r?\n> > > cage (and the road
\r?\n> > > > versus
\r?\n> > > > > track
\r?\n> > > > > > cage designs.)
\r?\n> > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > > Bill Bryant
\r?\n> > > > > > Santa Cruz, CA
\r?\n> > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > > "Jon M. Schaer" wrote:
\r?\n> > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > > > Is there any mechanical or design
\r?\n> difference
\r?\n> > > between the
\r?\n> > > > silver-cage and
\r?\n> > > > > the
\r?\n> > > > > > > black-cage models?
\r?\n> > > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > > > Thanks,
\r?\n> > > > > > >
\r?\n> > > > > > > Jon Schaer
\r?\n> > > > > > > Columbus, OH