Re: Debunking time again (Re: [CR]1962 Raleigh Gran Sport)

(Example: Racing)

From: Jerry & Liz Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: <GandJFahey@aol.com>, "Michael Kone" <bikevint@tiac.net>
Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <3.0.32.20020601080741.007106a4@pop.tiac.net>
Subject: Re: Debunking time again (Re: [CR]1962 Raleigh Gran Sport)
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 14:23:58 -0500


----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Kone" <bikevint@tiac.net> To: <GandJFahey@aol.com> Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:07 AM Subject: Re: Debunking time again (Re: [CR]1962 Raleigh Gran Sport)


> Actually exactly the same energy is returned as is put into the spring - if
> the spring is made of steel, aluminum, or titanium. Carbon fibre has the
> distinction as being the one material that can supposedly actually absorb
> energy from what I understand.
> Not if I remember my engineering dynamics and materials courses correctly. Flexing a steel (or aluminum) structure will dissipate some of the applied enery in the form of heat. Ever break a thin piece of steel in two by repeatedly bending it? You'll notice it gets noticeably warm near the break line. The same thing happens to a bike frame, but to a much lesser extent, so you won't notice the frame has warmed after a ride - also there is much more time and surface area to dissipate the heat released.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Houston, TX