Re: [CR]wheels vs frames

(Example: Framebuilders:Rene Herse)

From: <NortonMarg@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 20:42:34 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]wheels vs frames
To: Wdgadd@aol.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


In a message dated 6/4/02 5:19:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Wdgadd@aol.com writes:

<< The point of this, of course, is NOT that clinchers are better than tubulars. Just that all tubulars (even quality ones) are not created equal, nor are clinchers, and that tires have a tremendous impact on perceived ride quality, in my opinion, greater than tubing choice. >>

I heard a long time ago, (long enough ago to be on topic I hope) that the frame was a chassis by which you articulate the wheels. And that it's better to have 1st class wheels on a 2nd class frame, than vice versa. I don't want to belittle frames because I'm passionate about how great they can be, but as a framebuilder, I wanted people to not forget how important wheels and tires are. Everything goes through those two patches of rubber that are 1" square at best. I had some crummy Moroccan sew ups that made my bike feel terrible and cost me a crash. Stevan "No cheap tires!" Thomas Alameda, CA