Re: [CR]Re: Campy Record triple BB

(Example: Racing:Jean Robic)

From: <GPVB1@cs.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 00:20:51 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Campy Record triple BB
To: questor@cinci.rr.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


If the Record and Nuovo Record cups were the same as you assert, then:

1) Why different part numbers, and 2) What was "Nuovo" about the Nuovo Record BB?

(Hint: It was the rifling in the cups!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

The art on page 32 clearly shows the cups as different. Look at the inner diameters of both types. The Nuovo Record /A cups have the rifling, and the Record cups don't. It's very simple. We're not talking quantum physics here! Do you have an actual catalog, or a reprint? Maybe a poor reprint wouldn't show it.

Greg Parker

A2 MI USA Planet Earth

In a message dated 6/8/02 11:58:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, questor@cinci.rr.com writes:


> Hello Greg, this case is not closed...
>
> <<> Mark is correct. There never was an NR triple BB spindle.>>
>
> I agree that there were never any NR Triple BBs, but I still stand by my
> assertion that the cups for #746 and #745 RECORD seem to be the same as NR
> 746/A and 745/A cups used on the NR... can anyone else clarify this?
>
> <<Pg 31 Note the difference in bearing shoulder spacing between the 1046 set
> (wider spacing, Record), and the 1046/A set (narrower spacing, Nuovo
> Record).>>
>
> In your quick review of Pg 31, you may have missed that the 1046/3 Record
> triple axle is not even pictured for comparison. The 1046 and 1046A pics
> seem to be taken from different angles. Therefore, I would not draw hasty
> conclusions unless a true picture comparison of NR vs Triple axles can be
> made.
>
> Regards, Steve Neago
> Cincinnati, OH
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <GPVB1@cs.com>
> To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 9:37 PM
> Subject: [CR]Re: Campy Record triple BB
>
>
> > All:
> >
> > Mark is correct. There never was an NR triple BB spindle.
> >
> > The 1982 catalog, on page 32, which I am looking at right now, shows a
> 744/1
> > triple spindle, along with #746 and #745 RECORD non-rifled cups.
> >
> > The NR cups are part numbers 746/A and 745/A. These are to be used with
> the
> > 744/A Nuovo Record spindle.
> >
> > Page 31 of the same catalog actually shows the spindle differences much
> > better. Note the difference in bearing shoulder spacing between the 1046
> set
> > (wider spacing, Record), and the 1046/A set (narrower spacing, Nuovo
> Record).
> >
> > End of story.
> >
> > Greg Parker
> > A@ MI USA
> >
> > In a message dated 6/8/02 2:54:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org writes:
> >
> >
> > > Message: 18
> > > From: Mark Bulgier <mark@bulgier.net>
> > > To: 'Steve Neago' <questor@cinci.rr.com>
> > > Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> > > Subject: RE: [CR]WTB: Seeking Campy NR Triple BB
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 20:42:08 -0700
> > >
> > >
> > > I said that Campy never made a Nuovo Record (thick cup) Triple BB;
> > > Steve Neago replies:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the info, but please refer to the Campy 1982
> > > > catalogue Pg 32... it lists a "744/1 Triple chainring
> > > > cotterless spindle" which uses the same cups as a NR
> > > > spindle listed directly below the triple spindle.
> > >
> > > Well I'll be - I apologize for the misinformation.
> > >
> > > Anyone ever actually seen this axle, or could it be something that
> existed
> > > only in a catalog? It sure seems like it must be much rarer than the
> > > thin-cup triple axle, which is still easy to find to this day.
> > >
> > > Mark Bulgier
> > > Seattle, Wa
> > > USA