RE: [CR]History of below BB cable routing?

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [CR]History of below BB cable routing?
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:45:20 -0400
Thread-Topic: [CR]History of below BB cable routing?
Thread-Index: AcIQp+23DoBs0nxnEda/0gBQBLC6Xg==
From: "Rich Rose" <rrose@normandassociates.com>
To: <TADCPDAJD@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Yesterday, Chuck Schmidt wrote: <snipped Brandon's question, and Chuck's inventory of rust opportunities in brazed-on cable guides> "If they were so hot, you'd see them back on the bike by now. It's all evolution..."

Does e-Richie's 30th Anniversary model have the cable guides on top of the shell? Evolution, devolution, or revolution? In any case, I like the look of it (of course, I even liked the look of Campagnolo's clamp-on cable guides for routing over un-brazed BB-shells, and still have a Huret clamp-on guide for Rear Der, only). Tom Donahue Melbourne, FL (warm and moist)

Well, we'd have to hear from e-richie to know why the guides are "back on top" so to speak on the 30'Th. I think I know why ("Period Correct - Period"!). But, the look is much cleaner with the routing on the bottom IMHO. Richard (cleaner is usually better), Rose Toledo, Ohio