Re: [CR]Reynolds 531 vs Columbus

(Example: Production Builders)

From: <NortonMarg@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 22:18:48 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]Reynolds 531 vs Columbus
To: rena.cutrufelli@comcast.net, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


In a message dated 6/17/02 6:34:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, rena.cutrufelli@comcast.net writes:

<< Both Mr. Baylis and Mr. Tesch seem agreed that while Columbus tubing (I
   presume they mean SL) is fine, both favor Reynolds 531, at least by a slight
   margin. Is the preference based primarily on ride quality that results i.e.
   not other factors such as workability during construction? I have heard
   people who like 531 say that what they appreciate is that certain feedback
   from the road which is just a little different. >> Both of the esteemed ride moderately sized frames. I ride a 62cm and the only Reynolds framed bike I ever had that I really liked was a Ron Cooper track. It doesn't really prove anything as I don't really care for "all SL" frames either, but perhaps the choice is somewhat influenced by the frame size in question. The size we ride has a great deal to do with our opinions on the matter. Stevan Thomas Alameda, CA