Re: [CR]Replica vs. Counterfeit (part 1)

(Example: Events:Eroica)

Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 06:35:06 -0600
Subject: Re: [CR]Replica vs. Counterfeit (part 1)
From: "Steven L. Sheffield" <stevens@veloworks.com>
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <B95C0DB4.740%stevens@veloworks.com>


>> The Hetchin's situation is a little bit different. There are thousands
>> of Hetchins but not all are accounted for. To counterfeit a Hetchins
>> really seems to be folly since there are so many and they trade hands
>> for very reasonable prices. Why on earth anyone would bother with that
>> is beyond me. But many of you will remember the "Magnum Bogus". Someone
>> could have commissioned that frame; and as long as it wasn't represented
>> as a Hetchins it really wouldn't have mattered. But as soon as someone
>> claims it's a genuine Hetchins it becomes fraud. Again, anyone with any
>> experience could see that clinker a mile away. That one set off several
>> peoples' alarms. What ever happened to that bike anyway, anyone know
>> where it ended up and what it looks like now?
>
>
> If you are referring to the Ron Cooper built "Hetchins" at A Bicycle
> Odyssey, as shown here: http://www.hetchins.org/904.htm, I must reiterate
> that particular frame absolutely was built by Ron Cooper. When we explained
> the frame to clients we represented it as a modern built replica, which both
> we (and Ron) were being produced under license, like the current Bates
> replica frames.
>
> This frame was never represented as a classic Hetchins frame.

... Ummm ... Which both we (and Ron) THOUGHT were being produced under license ...

--

Steven L. Sheffield stevens at veloworks dot com veloworks at mac dot com aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash