[CR]Re: CR: Rare vs. Desireable

(Example: Racing:Beryl Burton)

From: <TADCPDAJD@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:18:01 EDT
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: [CR]Re: CR: Rare vs. Desireable

Brandon "monekyman" Ives wrote:
> 95% of the people on this list like old bikes but really aren't collectors.
> I think we are (collectively) a different kind of collector; the timeframe of interest for this list may be more recent, but does include bikes that are yet both rare and desireable (as well as affordable). This niche may or may not later command the same willingness to spend that other niches do, but right now I would rather spend $8100 for a '70s Confente than a bargain '30s Dayton. I don't buy bicycles for investment, but rather to enjoy. If or when the "big money" moves into this area of interest, I don't think most of us will cash out, but rather continue to enjoy or "collections." We just won't be able to enlarge those collections. Of course, this niche may never attract that kind of attention, in which case we get to continue to "wank" in our own little sandbox.
Tom Donahue
Melbourne, FL